![]() ![]() Exporting: Export results to TXT, CSV, XML.Details: Extensive information on hosts. ![]() This, coupled with its ease of use, makes it a top contender in the world of IP scanning software. In addition to its impressive feature set, Angry IP Scanner also boasts a lightweight package that doesn't compromise on functionality. The software also provides valuable information such as the currently logged user, workgroup, computer name, and MAC address. You can inspect individual IPs, search for open ports, and even access Windows Shares, FTP, Telnet, or trace route for selected entries on the list. The program comes loaded with numerous options for customization, allowing you to tailor the scanning process to your specific needs. Although, as we discovered during our tests, prolonged scans, particularly those targeting an entire IP class, can put a considerable strain on your computer's resources.įear not, for Angry IP Scanner has a secret weapon in its arsenal – a feature that optimizes search and minimizes scan times by utilizing separate threads for each address. In terms of performance, Angry IP Scanner is a swift operator, capable of conducting scans in record time. The settings menu is an impressive feat of user-friendliness, offering comprehensive explanations and details to help you get the most out of the program. The interface of Angry IP Scanner is a paragon of simplicity, sporting a clean and intuitive design that even novice users can easily navigate. This dedicated software is designed to help you determine the liveliness of an IP address with ease and precision. If you're seeking a comprehensive solution to monitor and assess the activity within your network, look no further than Angry IP Scanner. Perhaps the only downside was that Asus doesn't include a wall mount as an option, meaning you have to stand the device on a surface.Angry IP scanner is a very fast and small IP scanner. On the top end, the TP-Link was faster and could handle more devices simultaneously, which is exactly what it was designed to do, but for the vast majority of tasks, the RT-AC86U was excellent, sending fast broadband into the depths of our testing facility. In use, both the TP-Link and Asus performed exceptionally well. For most people, the AX11000 is likely too much, though, and the Asus is therefore a safer choice. We personally quite like both of these designs and because they're so similar, the choice becomes a little bit easier. In some ways, the RT-AC86U looks like the little brother of the AX11000, carrying over the same red and black design and antennas that broadcast Wi-Fi around the place. (And, let's be honest, that's the most likely place it'll be.)Īsus has gone for a slightly more subtle look but not by much. The AX11000 unlikely to fit in too well with a really minimalist house, but alongside a big PC case and Alienware keyboard, we think it fits. And it works, in our view: the design of the AX11000 is so out there that we don't mind it. When it comes to the physical designs of these two, you get the sense that the designers at TP-Link were huge Star Wars fans who decided to go wild. (Image credit: TP-Link) TP-Link Archer AX11000 vs Asus RT-AC86U: design and use
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |